|
|
Post by Mike - N.C. Pine Tar Sluggers on Feb 9, 2014 17:09:42 GMT -8
Joe Molinaro - Were there any other rule changes that are important?
I thought I brought up the 1 catcher with an extra utility ...
With such a crappy position and we start 14 something should be done
copied from CBS site
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike - N.C. Pine Tar Sluggers on Feb 9, 2014 17:11:56 GMT -8
I copied Joe's suggestion above from the CBS site since there had not been a response. I would be up to considering dropping the second C for a U player. That said, it would have to be in a future season. This move would diminish the keeper value of all catchers and affect some keepers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris - D-Town Diamond Dusters on Feb 11, 2014 8:39:25 GMT -8
I agree with the above - this would need to be a change that goes into effect for 2015. That said, I am definitely open to the change...
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenji - Raccoon City Swarmers on Feb 11, 2014 12:13:33 GMT -8
I agree. I'm in favor of this change.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe - Milwaukee Brewers on Feb 11, 2014 14:40:08 GMT -8
you know I think we should do it....
Why wait until next year?..anyone who keeps 2 catchers wont get screwed as they can put on bench or use at utility..
who is keeping 2 catchers to have this an issue?
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul - Hanover Headhunters on Feb 11, 2014 18:50:26 GMT -8
As always, I'm cool with whatever, as long as the point of embodiment is the following season. I know personally I've already made decisions on which 0 keepers to extend/not extend based on the need to keep/have two catchers. Personally, I like the additional element it adds, similarly the way the CI/MI slots work. Just my two cents.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doug - Tatooine Tusken-Raiders on Feb 11, 2014 20:43:09 GMT -8
Id be fine with one catcher. However, not until 2015. My strategy this year has to do with a keeper catcher.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris - D-Town Diamond Dusters on Feb 12, 2014 12:58:03 GMT -8
I would like to move forward with this change for 2015. What is the preference of what happens to the second C? Should it become a U, Bench, RP, P... I'm open to ideas or suggestions...
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey - Lakeland Flying Tigers on Feb 12, 2014 15:21:18 GMT -8
start an extra guy would be funner insted of bench
|
|
|
|
Post by Doug - Tatooine Tusken-Raiders on Feb 12, 2014 17:55:54 GMT -8
Might be funner to have another OF since we lost it last year. I'd be OK with another utility
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike - N.C. Pine Tar Sluggers on Feb 12, 2014 23:13:23 GMT -8
I think a Utility makes the most sense. Then you could use the #2 catcher if you wanted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenji - Raccoon City Swarmers on Feb 13, 2014 11:21:56 GMT -8
Utility.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe - Milwaukee Brewers on Feb 13, 2014 12:14:29 GMT -8
I would make it a utility so you can use anyone at that spot without restriction
|
|
|
|
Post by Gary - Durham Bulls on Feb 13, 2014 18:05:23 GMT -8
I would like one catcher and a utility slot
|
|
